🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.